Today I Ramble on About… The Lighthouse

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Yesterday I asked my friend the question: “Would you like to come see the Lighthouse with me?” It was a film that I had been closely anticipating the release of for a while now. The answer to that question was, and I’ll quote the message, “Honestly mate, it looks boring.” Oh boy was he wrong.

After a little convincing I was sat there in the cinema with him, waiting for it to start.

Before I start rambling on, what’s it even about? Well the film is directed by Robert Eggers, who also directed The Witch (2015).

William Dafoe and Robert Pattinson, who are working as lighthouse keepers, become stranded on their island in which they are stationed in wake of a storm. Alright, that doesn’t seem so bad does it? Well it’s just the two of them, stuck on this island completely isolated and we are left to witness them slowly lose their sanity…

Let’s go into some more detail…

The movie is shot in a 1. 19:1 aspect ratio on 35mm black and white film, which from the opening scenes, creates a very cramped and claustrophobic atmosphere. It somehow makes the already small location of the island in which we stay at for the duration of its running time even smaller. The choice to film this way was bold, and the extra work and effort to give the film this classic style really pays off. It also shows how great filmmaking can shine through technical limitations.

William Defoe and Robert Patterson both give excellent performances, though my one issue is that I struggled to hear some of the dialogue through the accent that Defoe uses. Some of his dialogue was a little lost in the mix but not enough for the film to become unenjoyable (this is just a tiny nit-pick). Patterson’s progression into mania especially showcases his abilities as an actor, and I’m glad to see how well his career seems to be doing as of recently.

Accompanying all of this was a spinetingling, deeply unsettling score which amplifies the impact of some scenes. Sound design as well is something of note, one scene in particular utilises a sound which has been heavily edited and distorted. This created a chilling moment which I’m not likely to forget for a while.

There are some moments where the film seems to drag a little bit, giving you some small brief moments to breathe but it soon picks right back up, plunging you back down deep into to the distressing imagery exploring these themes of isolation.

By the end, my friend was frozen in his seat. I asked him what he thought of it, and he replied telling me that this was one of the only movies that had ever truly scared him. So, all in all, I think the film did its job!

Even if you think you may not enjoy this one because of the more unconventional visual style, if you like a good well-made psychological horror then give it a shot.

Thanks for reading this far if you’re still here, and farewell!

Visit my Instagram @rambling_critic for updates on whenever I post.

Today I Ramble on About… 1917

Rating: 5 out of 5.

So, at the time of writing this I’m sat, here on my bed after scrambling to get my laptop out to start writing this review after getting back from 1917.

I’ve been a fan of Sam Mendes’ work for a while, and hearing that he was making a film set in World War I really excited me; ‘if anyone could really capture this brutal, traumatizing period of history, it’s this guy: the man who directed American Beauty,’ I thought. All jokes aside, then I heard that this movie would be in the ‘one-shot’ style of filmmaking akin to Birdman that I’m a huge fan of. By that point my attention was at its peak.

Before going to see the film, I was reading about how the script was based on the true stories of Alfred H. Mendes and the experiences that he had during the war. If nothing else, this film will make you truly appriciate the living hell that these brave men had to experience, for reasons they may not have even properly understood.

‘But how is the film!’ you’re probably asking. None of what I say could possibly do the film justice, so I highly recommend you just go out and see it. Feel free to stick around and listen to me ramble about it for the next minute though.

So, first off, the most notable thing about this is the cinematography, which is the best I’ve seen in years. Mendes and Deakins have managed to pull off the ‘one-shot’ style in the best that has ever been. The film is so immersive that I was afraid to blink in case I missed something. The extra effort needed to pull this off has paid off exceptionally. It’s just visually stunning from start to finish.

Both Georgy MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman give great performances as the two soldiers whom we follow throughout, MacKay especially delivers some intense emotional moments in a way that is very realistic to how someone may react in the situations his character is put through.

The dialogue is similar to Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk, in that in comparison to other films there isn’t a whole lot of it. This is where talent shines through the physical acting put on display by the cast.

It’s well paced, has a great emotional score, has stunning visuals, excellent cinematography, stellar acting… are you not sold yet?! Even if war films aren’t your personal cup of tea, still give this a chance. There might be something you enjoy.

I’ll be looking forward to seeing how it continues to do during award season and will be eagerly anticipating Sam’s next work.

Thanks for reading this far if you’re still here, and farewell!

Visit my Instagram @rambling_critic for more!

Today I Ramble on About… Joker

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Few films released in the last few years have caused quite as much of a fuss as Joker; directed by Todd Phillips. Opinions on the film vary depending on where you look. The film released to wide critical acclaim, yet some utterly despised it. I’ll talk about one possible reason for this later, but for now let’s take a look at the film itself.

The plot is a character study of Arthur Fleck, a failing comedian who is suffering from mental health issues formed from a traumatic past. The character is shown nothing but constant rejection throughout the film, where he is beaten down to a dark place where his persona of the Joker is eventually conceived. It’s a powerful cautionary tale, one that comments on how we as a society treat our fellow man, and its poignant message seems more relevant than ever today.

Joaquin Phoenix gives an Oscar worthy performance, whom we luckily get to see on screen for most of the running time. Joaquin portrays somebody reaching the edge of sanity so convincingly that some moments are disturbing purely from his performance alone.

His work is accompanied by a tense yet emotional score by Hildur Guonadottir. It creates an uncomfortable atmosphere that grabs you as soon as the movie begins and holds the audience in its grasp until the end credits. My theatre had moments of almost disturbing silence during some scenes, my hands clenching the armrests of my seat during these sequences. It was oddly silent when the credits started to roll, and people just got up and walked out. By no doubt, this a difficult film to sit through, but I think that’s more or less the purpose…

The film has gained a lot of criticism for how it could potentially promote violence by portraying the Joker in a more sympathetic light. Instead of a one-dimensional villain, the character of Arthur is slowly beaten through a downward spiral, eventually driven into lashing back out at the people who hurt him. We are given understanding of his motives and are even able to feel an element of sympathy for his character. This discussion caused quite a controversy surrounding the release with some on the internet praising the movie for attempting to explore a new and interesting backstory for this iconic character, but with others claiming that the film could potentially inspire acts of real-world violence.

So is the films approach to this character dangerous? Is the fact that we can almost sympathise with him initially dangerous? Well, no, I don’t believe so. The film never justifies his heinous crimes, however we as an audience are able to understand the reason behind these actions and really see his eventual plunge into insanity.

The fact is stories like this need to be told. Complex characters such as Arthur can help us better understand the real world and how there is always a backstory behind every person, even ones who commit evil. Film can be a reflection of our surroundings, so the very fact that a film like this has been made in our modern age is a statement in its own right. We should strive to treat our fellow man with respect and empathy, which is something that this film highlights.

Yes, this is a tough one to watch but that’s how it should be. This is something that will stick with you and I have no doubt that Joaquin’s portrayal of this famous character will become iconic. For its minor faults, it still holds up as my favourite film of the year and is one of the best things I have ever seen from DC.

Thanks for reading this far if you’re still here, and farewell!

Visit my Instagram @rambling_critic for more!

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started